3219 views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline AshSimmonds

  • Geekitecht

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Drives: GF's shitbox :(
  • Location: Adelayed
  • Name: Humble Narrator
  • www: AshSimmonds.com
Click pic for hi-res version.

0-400m in 11.7
0-100kph in 3.5



Offline mhh

  • Chief Test Pilot

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Location: Adelaide
Click pic for hi-res version.

0-400m in 11.7
0-100kph in 3.5

Sorry to nit pick but that 3.5 sec is for 0-96km/h not 0-100km/h



Offline AshSimmonds

  • Geekitecht

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Drives: GF's shitbox :(
  • Location: Adelayed
  • Name: Humble Narrator
  • www: AshSimmonds.com
Sorry to nit pick but that 3.5 sec is for 0-96km/h not 0-100km/h

yeah i meant 0-60mph but it's rough enough for me.

as an aside, here's a quote from LP to show how stupidly confusing the American system is (they were comparing the Ford GT to the Super G)

Quote
You do realize you are quoting a test in which a GT absolutely ruined the SLR to 186 right?  :eusa_naughty: And the SLR was only .5 quicker to 155, which I thought no way would it be close to the SLR at 173?  If it was .5 behind at 155, and 3.3 ahead at 186...I wonder where it was at 173?

 :confused:



Offline mhh

  • Chief Test Pilot

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Location: Adelaide
yeah i meant 0-60mph but it's rough enough for me.

as an aside, here's a quote from LP to show how stupidly confusing the American system is (they were comparing the Ford GT to the Super G)

 :confused:

It's OK - I'm old enough to be able to do some of the calcs in my head.



Offline AshSimmonds

  • Geekitecht

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Drives: GF's shitbox :(
  • Location: Adelayed
  • Name: Humble Narrator
  • www: AshSimmonds.com
It's OK - I'm old enough to be able to do some of the calcs in my head.

Yeah, I grew up on building sites in the 80's with an old-school carpenter using "modern" plans, so having to know measurements in *any* format was a requirement.  Really odd, I think of distance in metres/km but power in Hp/Tq - and weight/height I'm par on either.



Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
test guest

Started by guestash Site Stuff

8 Replies
4994 Views
Last post Thu, 05 Jul, 2007 - 13:05
by AshSimmonds
2 Replies
2295 Views
Last post Tue, 12 Jul, 2011 - 20:15
by Cuso
0 Replies
952 Views
Last post Tue, 15 Nov, 2011 - 14:11
by matespace
1 Replies
2054 Views
Last post Fri, 27 Jul, 2012 - 17:12
by TWD
11 Replies
3231 Views
Last post Wed, 11 Sep, 2013 - 10:49
by 360c


Latest Discussions

BOARD TOPIC MEMBER POSTED
[ Number Plates ] NSW Number Plates tdc911 Today at 21:31
[ Cars ] Maserati Gransport Keys dodger Today at 20:48
[ Cars ] Help Me to Find Best Wedding Reception Venues Sydney? PA Today at 20:21
[ Gadgets and Technology ] Forget about Lily, this is cooler charliekay Today at 19:01
[ BMW M Power ] BMW 8 Series Concept TJB Today at 16:15
[ Racing ] Australian GT series tdc911 Today at 13:01
[ British Cars ] RR Cullinan 360c Today at 11:12
[ Off Topic ] Teevee and moovees 360c Today at 01:02
[ Racing ] ADAC Nurburgring 24 Hours tdc911 Yesterday at 22:05
[ McLaren ] McLaren 720S mhh Yesterday at 21:24