256111 views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline 265T


  • Joined: Dec 2006

  • Location:
  • Drives:



Offline AshSimmonds

  • Geekitecht

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Drives: GF's shitbox :(
  • Location: Adelayed
  • Name: Humble Narrator
  • www: AshSimmonds.com
i've been having a bit of a play between posts

what do you think between the original & photoshopped versions? Am i on the right track or is it overdone?

looks a bit better, not too much you can do with it, one of the banes of a photographers life is a plain overcast sky.  proper clouds are awesome, and sunny skies at least have some graduation in the colouring, but a plain overcast sky is often impossible to make look any good. :(


Image



Offline 265T


  • Joined: Dec 2006

  • Location:
  • Drives:
so you've just used brightness/contrast on that? i used some hue/saturation



Offline AshSimmonds

  • Geekitecht

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Drives: GF's shitbox :(
  • Location: Adelayed
  • Name: Humble Narrator
  • www: AshSimmonds.com
so you've just used brightness/contrast on that? i used some hue/saturation

added a little saturation too, bring out the green.  it actually looked equally alright with almost zero saturation too.



Offline 265T


  • Joined: Dec 2006

  • Location:
  • Drives:
here's one i took today trying to get the arty farty angle

Image

Image



Offline OzCarSightings

  • Will eat your baby
  • Photographer

  • Joined: May 2006

  • Drives: GenF HSV/Golf R32/motorbike
  • Location: Perth
  • www: JanGlovac.com


i've been playing with shutter speeds atm to get the blurred background effect


shutter speed isn't going to affect the depth of field (blurred b/g) - start playing with the aperture. :)



Offline AshSimmonds

  • Geekitecht

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Drives: GF's shitbox :(
  • Location: Adelayed
  • Name: Humble Narrator
  • www: AshSimmonds.com
shutter speed isn't going to affect the depth of field (blurred b/g) - start playing with the aperture. :)

welcome sensei  :worship:



Offline AshSimmonds

  • Geekitecht

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Drives: GF's shitbox :(
  • Location: Adelayed
  • Name: Humble Narrator
  • www: AshSimmonds.com
i was always amazed at the colours in your shots, i feel a lot better now knowing most of my shots look like the befores

back on this one again, last year in the NT Finny ( http://aussieexotics.com/forum/profiles/finny-u42.html ) told me that i HAVE to get a polariser.

much like sunnies, it removes a lot of glare, and depending on the angle of the lens (you can twist it) you can nullify various glare effects or emphasise colours.  the biggest difference it has is that you no longer require anywhere near as much contrast, as the colours are somewhat deeper, and the skies are much much more dramatic.  this depends a lot on the time of day too, when the sun is at a greater than 45 degree angle the effects are much more pronounced, when it's high in the sky, it takes more effort to make the most of it.

i only just got my polarising filter before the last NT trip, and the difference is pretty amazing on the majority of pics.  however, the caveat is that a great deal more of my photos were completely bloody useless, especially with more than a couple X zoom.  i don't know why this is, but it was annoying as i thought i'd taken some great photos.  :mad:

here's a couple original photos, absolutely *nothing* done to them, as you can see almost nothing apart from some cropping is needed on these pics, gives you an idea of what the right angles can do with a polarising filter - compared to the "washed out" photos i posted earlier.



Offline 265T


  • Joined: Dec 2006

  • Location:
  • Drives:
shutter speed isn't going to affect the depth of field (blurred b/g) - start playing with the aperture. :)


 :o thanks dingo




Offline 265T


  • Joined: Dec 2006

  • Location:
  • Drives:
here's a couple original photos, absolutely *nothing* done to them, as you can see almost nothing apart from some cropping is needed on these pics, gives you an idea of what the right angles can do with a polarising filter - compared to the "washed out" photos i posted earlier.

wow.....that's a big difference Ash


my photos were completely bloody useless, especially with more than a couple X zoom.  i don't know why this is, but it was annoying as i thought i'd taken some great photos.  :mad:

what happened to the crap shots - why were they crap?




Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
3 Replies
3677 Views
Last post Thu, 28 May, 2009 - 01:42
by AshSimmonds
1046 Replies
289991 Views
Last post Wed, 02 Jan, 2013 - 16:09
by app
43 Replies
56667 Views
Last post Sat, 20 Nov, 2010 - 21:31
by alvchua
14 Replies
7055 Views
Last post Wed, 25 Jun, 2014 - 18:36
by mondi
21 Replies
9437 Views
Last post Sat, 31 Mar, 2012 - 21:21
by dodger


Latest Discussions

BOARD TOPIC MEMBER POSTED
[ McLaren ] 675 LT Spider JPG Yesterday at 23:20
[ Racing ] 2017 Formula 1 Tipping game PA Yesterday at 20:43
[ Racing ] Seeking photos of Brian Ginger - died in 1993 London-Sydney Marathon Chicky01 Yesterday at 17:38
[ Ferrari ] 812 Superfast shack Yesterday at 16:57
[ Funny Cool Stoopid ] it's funny cause i'm drunk!! dodger Yesterday at 16:20
[ Racing ] Australian GT series dkabab Yesterday at 13:32
[ Off Topic ] Real Estate 360c Yesterday at 11:48
[ British Cars ] JAGUAR XJ220 tdc911 Fri, 24 Mar, 2017 - 17:36
[ Air Crash Investigations ] For those thinking of a private jet dkabab Fri, 24 Mar, 2017 - 17:32
[ Racing ] Lola Larousse LC88 goober Fri, 24 Mar, 2017 - 17:17