64901 views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline PA

  • One man comedy gala

  • Joined: Jan 2008

  • Location: www.club-carbon.com
I'll open the betting with 4 Reds.



Offline flamestone

  • Geekographer

  • Joined: Jul 2007

  • Drives: to and from everywhere
  • Location: Central Coast
  • Name: Shane
  • www: Flamestone.com



Offline PA

  • One man comedy gala

  • Joined: Jan 2008

  • Location: www.club-carbon.com



Offline dkabab

just got 3 of a kind.... and what a great triple  :thumbsup:



Offline PA

  • One man comedy gala

  • Joined: Jan 2008

  • Location: www.club-carbon.com



Offline AshSimmonds

  • Geekitecht

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Drives: GF's shitbox :(
  • Location: Adelayed
  • Name: Humble Narrator
  • www: AshSimmonds.com



Offline dkabab

lol, nice work on the link/5 card draw



Offline AshSimmonds

  • Geekitecht

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Drives: GF's shitbox :(
  • Location: Adelayed
  • Name: Humble Narrator
  • www: AshSimmonds.com
lol, nice work on the link/5 card draw

:D - hey it might be fun.

I had a really good one ages ago back when it was originally only 5 card stud, I think it was a sequence of 3 - but even I can't find it. :?



Offline dkabab

i remember you posting it.

does the random image loader favour new images? because the callendar shoot you did seems to show up every 2nd refresh....
or is it because..... it takes random images evenly from each gallery, some galleries are big and random, and some are small and all of one car, and hence i would notice those ones reoccuring more often...

or am i overthinking it....



Offline AshSimmonds

  • Geekitecht

  • Joined: Feb 2006

  • Drives: GF's shitbox :(
  • Location: Adelayed
  • Name: Humble Narrator
  • www: AshSimmonds.com
i remember you posting it.

What was the subject?  I'm pretty sure it was like 3 consecutive photos, which out of 15k+ was going to be uber-rare.

does the random image loader favour new images?  because the callendar shoot you did seems to show up every 2nd refresh....

No, must be viewer bias. :p

The way it works is simply that it counts the total number of pics in the gallery and picks a random number between zero and the highest number - that's why there's the occasional error for images that don't exist or were posted too small.

or is it because..... it takes random images evenly from each gallery, some galleries are big and random, and some are small and all of one car, and hence i would notice those ones reoccuring more often...

or am i overthinking it....

Yes.  You're overthinking it like a girl.  No single image has any greater chance that any other in the "poker zone". 

Images that are tagged "wallpaper" get loads more exposure around the rest of the site.